THE
THOUGHTS OF A GREAT PRESIDENT AND A PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE
A person’s thought is
central to that person’s actions, habits, character, and destiny. Consequently,
a great or failed destiny flows from a person’s thought. Thus the thought of a
president or a potential president is a good basis for electorates to know the
kind of a president that person would be. While admitting that good thoughts
alone do not guarantee prudent and wise exercise of a political power; it can
never be glossed over. In this article, we will review certain thoughts of
Nelson Mandela of South Africa and Jimmy Carter of the USA to make out how
their thoughts contributed to their great leadership exploits.
Firstly, great
presidents acknowledge the truth that greatness is not in duration but in
depth. This means that one’s affective attitude (such as passion, courage,
confidence and a commitment to principles) towards the achievement of that
person’s God-given purpose is more important than the amount of time it takes
to accomplish that purpose. Studies have shown that many people select leaders
who fight for what is right, often under very difficult circumstances and who
also care for the needs of their people. This means that great leaders selflessly
fight for right causes with the aim of securing the good welfare of their
people. To such leaders, holding a political office is a means to ending the
right causes they fought for. Ex-president Nelson Mandela’s name is usually
published alongside true greats like Mother Teresa, Ghandi, Martin Luther King
Jnr. and others because of his good thoughts. He once said, “When my ultimate
aim was achieved, it was time to move on to a higher calling. Ironically, the
day I was inaugurated into office as president, I knew my job was already done
and therefore began preparing to leave. In that regard, you may say that my
very first day in office was also my last day. In my mind, I had already begun
packing out”. Unfortunately, this thought has eluded many so-called political leaders
particularly in Africa. Consequently, they have believed the lie that spending
many years in a political office is a guarantee that they will accomplish their
purposes. On the contrary, they usually achieve the opposite!
Great presidential
candidates on their part focus on their God-given visions, not criticisms.
Although criticisms of all forms can be turned into political assets, a true
potential president will primarily focus on her vision. This was so with
candidate Jimmy Carter. Carter had good thoughts about criticisms when seeking
the highest political office of USA. He acknowledged both the good and the bad
twists of criticisms and determined to keep his eyes on his vision. At one breath,
he saw some positivity in some criticisms marshaled against him: “I want to be
tested in the most severe way. I want the American people to understand my
character and weaknesses, the kind of person I am.” He was however quick to
deduce the real motives of his destructive critics in the following words: “My
critics don’t want to stop Carter. They want to stop the reforms I am committed
to. They want to stop the people of this country from regaining control of
their government. They want to preserve the status quo, to preserve politics as
usual, to maintain at all costs their entrenched, unresponsive, bankrupt,
irresponsible political power”. Therefore, a real presidential candidate sees
criticisms as a test of one’s character and vision. Focusing on one’s vision in
the midst of intense criticisms is central to greatness.
Secondly, great
presidents continue to keep in mind that they are still human beings no matter the
feats they attain or the great heights they reach. This trait enables them to
acknowledge their weaknesses and yet be committed to their visions. Besides, it
enables them to accept the truth that they cannot take the place of God in
human affairs. That God, like governments, is the only person who can do for
the people what they cannot do for themselves. Thus real presidents concentrate
on what is humanly possible and trust God for the impossible things.
Unfortunately, some so-called leaders bestow upon themselves titles such as
“Messiah”, and “Saviour”. Nelson Mandela is among the few exception: ‘While it
is nice to be appreciated, I shudder at the continuous reference to me as
“living legend” or “Secular Saint” or any other such references and the near-worshipful
adulation that invariably seems to creep in with it. That was one of the things
that worried me – to be raised to the position of a semi-god – because then you
are no longer a human being. I wanted to be known as Mandela, a man with
weaknesses, some of which are fundamental, but a man who is committed’.
Great presidential
candidates are not afraid of electoral ‘defeat’. Common sense makes it obvious that only one
person can be a president of any nation at a time. Regardless of their
convictions and visions, real presidential candidates are more than willing to
concede ‘defeat’ if they are not elected. They consider their “rejection” as a
‘de-feat’, never a defeat. ‘De-feat’ in the sense that they were not given the
opportunity to attain some desired feats. In other words, electoral defeat only
denotes a lost opportunity to magnify one’s influence. “I am running for
president,” Carter said, “because I have a vision of a new America, a different
America, a better America, and it is not shared by those who are trying so hard
to stop my campaign…I see an America with a president who does not govern by
vetoes and negativism, but with vigor and vision and positive, affirmative,
aggressive leadership.” Despite his good thoughts for America, candidate Jimmy
Carter was willing to accept the ‘de-feat’ of his vision for America: “…I feel
like I’m doing the best I can, and if I get elected president, I’ll have a
chance to magnify my own influence, maybe in a beneficial way. If I don’t get
elected president, I’ll go back to Plains”. Mitt Romney is commended for
conceding ‘defeat’ in one of the most aggressive electoral contests in living
memory. For Kofi Annan, the “willingness of a loser to accept defeat
gracefully, and the victor to show respect for the losing side, is one of the
hallmarks of a stable democracy”.
A person’s thought is a
replica of that person. This is because the thoughts of any person denote that
person’s actions, habits, character and destiny! Messrs Nelson Mandela and
Jimmy Carter are among the great presidents this world has ever witnessed. The
secret to their great leadership heights is that they had good thoughts
concerning the presidency of their respective nations. We must therefore
scrutinize the thoughts of any person who is seeking to govern the affairs of Ghana.
Remember, a person’s thought is imbedded in his actions, character and habits.
Richard Obeng Mensah, author of If You Think of Your Opposition You Lose Your Position .The writer is an award-winning author of 7 books and over 250 articles. He is also a certified life and leadership coach, a lawyer, a legal academic and a blogger. Blog: www.richard-obeng-mensah.blogspot.com Email: richardobengmensah@gmail.com © 27 November 2012.
