THE WOES OF
OUR JUDGES
Pilate said to Him, “What is the truth?” – John
18:38a (NKJV).
Justice
Barbados Ngoromah is known for his passion for freedom and justice. His
constant strives to achieve excellence and integrity in all his official duties
and responsibilities is also obvious to every person of average intelligence.
No wonder he has risen from a magistrate to be the presiding judge of the
Supreme Council of the Divided State
of Honeyland. Two emerging influential leaders in the country recently had some
duel. Thank God, wisdom was allowed to prevail over emotions so the case was
referred to the council for peaceful adjudication. The two leaders command a
wide following and each of them and their followers are very interested in the
outcome of the case. The outcome of the case has the potential to either worsen
the perceived division in the country or unite the people for leap advancement.
Justice
Ngoromah and his other council members are being eyed by the people of Honeyland. The actions and inactions of the
council members, in the course of the adjudication process, are unnecessarily
scrutinized with the divisive and biased mindset of some of the citizens of the
country. Some of the disciples of the main leaders demonstrate in their
utterances that they have neither shelved nor separated their views from that
of their dogmatic loyalty to their masters. One would have thought that they
would take a cue from their masters and allowed wisdom to override their
emotions and biases because of the volatile nature of the case.
The
facts of the case is slightly different from the biblical account involving a
decision to free either a convicted criminal or Jesus. That case was an either or affair. One person was to be
freed and the other was to be crucified. Barabbas was a notorious robber but
Jesus was a respected righteous leader. Pilate was by custom supposed to
release either of them. Although Pilate discerned the innocence of Jesus he was
nevertheless influenced by public outcry to deliver Him to the people to be
crucified. However, the case before the council is somewhat different from the
one that was before Pilate. The significant distinction is that the instant
case is not necessarily an either or affair.
Besides, the public, unlike in the biblical account, is divided in their
opinions and expectations.
Will
Justice Ngoromah and his other council members cave in to any of the divisive
outcry of the dogmatic loyalists of the two main leaders? If not, will their prudent decision appeal to any person of
average intelligence since truth is simple? Undoubtedly, Justice Ngoromah and
his other council members need divine wisdom and the courage to completely and
effectually adjudicate upon the matters in issue. I will therefore urge the people
of Honeyland to shelve their biases and unite in their prayers for the council
members to deliver ‘Solomonic’ judgment speedily. More importantly, I call on the
two leaders to appeal to their dogmatic disciples to allow wisdom to override
their emotions. I pray accordingly.
Richard
Obeng Mensah, author of Wisdom
Thoughts. Email: richardobengmensah@gmail.com Blog:
Richard-obeng-mensah.blogspot.com